April 03, 2008
Another Sex study
Damn I just crack up over these sex studies. Well Ace found another one. Actually it was Drew that posted it, but hell its not like morons can tell the difference between one blogger on ace's site unless its Laura posting cat pics, because lets face it - her hump just gets in the way! LOL
Anyway! We now have science vindicating the theory that longer sex sessions are not needed! Remember, this is science and surely science cannot be manipulated!
Here is the money quote!
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Anyway! We now have science vindicating the theory that longer sex sessions are not needed! Remember, this is science and surely science cannot be manipulated!
Here is the money quote!
Maybe men had it right all along: It doesn't take long to satisfy a
woman in bed. A survey of sex therapists concluded the optimal amount
of time for sexual intercourse was 3 to 13 minutes. The findings, to be
published in the May issue of the Journal of Sexual Medicine, strike at
the notion that endurance is the key to a great sex life.
If that sounds like good news to you, don't cheer too loudly. The time does not count foreplay, and the therapists did rate sexual intercourse that lasts from 1 to 2 minutes as "too short."
...Dr. Irwin Goldstein, editor of the Journal of Sexual Medicine, cited a four-week study of 1,500 couples in 2005 that found the median time for sexual intercourse was 7.3 minutes. (Women were armed with stopwatches.)
Posted by: Robert Woolwine at
10:55 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.
14kb generated in CPU 0.0091, elapsed 0.0846 seconds.
33 queries taking 0.0787 seconds, 94 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
33 queries taking 0.0787 seconds, 94 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
