October 21, 2008

Powell Endorsement = Obama Duplicity (again?)

I have a question and I hope someone might be able to answer it.  We all know that General Powell endorsed the Messiah a couple of days ago.  Most right center blogs have talked about it and well in muted tones.  I think we all can agree that Powell at most was a RINO if he was even registered as a Republican (I am not sure, I never checked).  That's all fine and good.  My question relates to his fundamental role in helping shape US foreign policy since 9/11.  Here we have a very talented general who as Secretary of State defended our actions especially in the war in Iraq.  Here is what Wikipeda has to say after a quick search:

Powell came under fire for his role in building the case for the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. In a press statement on February 24, 2001 he had said that sanctions against Iraq had prevented the development of any weapons of mass destruction by Saddam Hussein. As was the case in the days leading up to the Persian Gulf War, Powell was initially opposed to a forcible overthrow of Hussein, preferring to continue a policy of containment. However, Powell eventually agreed to go along with the Bush administration's determination to remove Hussein. He had often clashed with others in the administration, who were reportedly planning an Iraq invasion even before the September 11 attacks—an insight supported by testimony by former terrorism czar Richard Clarke in front of the 9/11 Commission. The main concession Powell wanted before he would offer his full support for the Iraq War was the involvement of the international community in the invasion, as opposed to the unilateral approach some advocated. He was also successful in persuading Bush to take the case of Iraq to the United Nations, and in moderating other initiatives. Powell was placed at the forefront of this diplomatic campaign.

Powell's chief role was to garner international support for a multi-national coalition to mount the invasion. To this end, Powell addressed a plenary session of the United Nations Security Council on February 5, 2003 to argue in favor of military action. Citing "numerous" anonymous Iraqi defectors, Powell asserted that "there can be no doubt that Saddam Hussein has biological weapons and the capability to rapidly produce more, many more."[16] Powell also stated that there was "no doubt in my mind" that Saddam was working to obtain key components to produce nuclear weapons.[16]

Fast forward to the present.  Obama ran on basically the Iraq war was wrong ticket.  To this day he wont repudiate his stance.  And now, after running on this stand since well 2002 NOW, Obama is now saying that Powell will have a place in an Obama administration?  Wait, I thought all Bush Cronies were evil?   What gives?  Who would have thought that an architect to US foreign policy after 9/11 who helped launch the US to war and defended our actions to go to war against Iraq would have such a prominent place in Obama's administration!  Is this just another example of Obama duplicity? 

Posted by: Robert Woolwine at 09:24 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 519 words, total size 4 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
17kb generated in CPU 0.0097, elapsed 0.0836 seconds.
33 queries taking 0.0773 seconds, 94 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.